This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

fusion rocket

Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the lord's day, simply closer to home scientists are trying to develop fusion reactors that could provide immense amounts of energy. These reactors are big and (currently) inefficient, but a NASA-funded startup called Princeton Satellite Systems is working on a small-calibration fusion reactor that could power advanced fusion rockets. Suddenly, other planets and even other star systems could be in reach.

All the forms of rocket propulsion we currently have involve accelerating propellant out of a nozzle. Then, physics takes over and the vessel moves in the opposite management. Most spacecraft apply chemical propulsion, which provides a large amount of thrust over a relatively short period of time. Some missions have been equipped with ion drives, which use electrical currents to advance propellant. These engines are very efficient, merely they take low thrust and require a lot of ability. A fusion rocket might offering the best mix of capabilities.

Current nuclear reactors use fission to generate energy; large atomic nuclei are broken apart and some of that mass is transformed into energy. Fusion is the opposite. Minor atomic nuclei are fused together, causing some mass to be converted into energy. This is what powers stars, only we've had problem producing the necessary temperatures and pressure on Earth to become cyberspace positive energy generation.

Princeton Satellite Systems is working on a modest fusion reactor that would but be 1.5 meters across and four-eight meters long (iv.9 past 13-26 anxiety). A experimental fusion power plant might cost $20 billion, but the smaller version existence developed by Princeton Satellite Systems should only price near $xx million. NASA seems interested in the thought, besides. It's given Princeton Satellite Systems three grants then far to pursue its research.

Nuclear Fusion

The goal is to generate ane kilowatt per kilogram, so a x-megawatt reactor would weight nigh x metric tons. This provides all the power a spacecraft would need, regardless of its distance from the sun, but what about propulsion? A fusion reactor uses magnetic fields and depression-frequency radio waves to shrink and oestrus thing until it becomes plasma that tin undergo fusion (Princeton Satellite Systems uses a mix of deuterium and helium-3 in its reactor). Every bit the plasma rotates, some of it can be directed out of a nozzle, and y'all've got a high-thrust, high-efficiency engine.

Faster, more than efficient rocket engines could cut the run a risk of radiation exposure for man explorers by getting them to their destination and dwelling faster. It could also send probes to distant targets in a fraction of the time it currently takes. For example, a 1-megawatt fusion rocket could attain Pluto in four years, whereas it took New Horizons nine years.

At that place are still issues to address with Princeton Satellite Systems' design. For one, the reactor produces dangerous radiations that requires shielding from crew and computer systems. Additionally, helium-3 is rare on Earth. The company hopes to take a working prototype reactor by 2019 or 2020. From there, the heaven's the limit.

Now read: How does fusion power 'work,' and will it ever be feasible?